Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 22, 2009

EON Dispatch from Copenhagen, Dec. 21, 2009

December 21, 2009

Hi Guys,
Packing up in Copenhagen.  Here’s our parting report.
Back in Bo on Tues.
Merry Christmas
J & MB
==================
ITS THE SYSTEM STUPID
The Ragnarok of Globalized Corporate Capitalism and the Rise of the Planetarian Paradigm
by James Heddle


Contradictions on the Horizon

You see them as you fly in.  ‘Wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen, Lovely Ol’ Girl of the Sea,’ as Danny Kaye’s Hans Christian Anderson character once sang in the ’50’s movie, embodies in its skyline the contrasts and contradictions facing us all in the inevitable transition to a post-carbon future.  A scan across the harbor’s horizon reveals a phalanx of giant wind-generators spinning ponderously in the ocean breeze, flanked by an array of coal and gas-fired power plants discharging plumes of carbon into the lowering overcast.  Just visible to the east across the narrow strip of ocean that separates Denmark from Sweden you can make out the inactive cooling tower of Barsebek nuclear power plant, shut down as a result of public pressure generated by anti-nuclear NGO’s in both countries.

Denmark itself enjoys a reputation as a bastion of cradle-to-grave social democracy that makes it the envy of US universal health care advocates.  Yet its current politics exhibit an alarming strain of right-wing repressiveness made evident in recent draconian legislation hostile to public dissent and in the repressive tactics employed by its ‘politi’ toward non-violent mass demonstrators during COP15.  At least a thousand were preemptively detained, some brutally beaten with batons, all denied water and toilets and caged for long periods in a cold detention center in recent days.  Yet only four were formally charged.

The most egregious case was that of  Climate Justice Action’s German spokesman and famously non-violent organizer Tadzio Muller, who was grabbed by Danish plainclothesmen outside the Summit meeting, detained for several days, and released without charge after the UN’s fifteenth Conference of the Parties (COP 15) was over.

Still, despite its large per capita carbon footprint, Denmark has much to teach the world about energy transition.  It has officially eschewed nuclear power and weapons.  It has a thriving bicycle culture rivaling that of China, with broad bike lanes lining all its main streets and a teeming daily multitude of dedicated cyclist-commuters even in the depth of the Scandinavian winter.  Its public transport system of reliably scheduled trains, subways and buses, and its readily-available taxies is second to none.

Top-Down Meets Bottom-Up

My partner, Mary Beth Brangan, and I manage a non-profit, EON – the Ecological Options Network, that provides media services for progressive organizations.  Having decided to come to Copenhagen too late to secure accreditation for the over-crowded official UN COP 15 process at the Bella Center, we have focused our efforts both of necessity and by preference on documenting video events at the alternate venues of the Klimaforum09 and Christiania’s  ‘Climate Bottom’ conferences, where hundreds of activists and progressive thought leaders concentrated on sharing solution-oriented analysis and organizational strategies.

In contrast to the official conference venue, the Bella Center, where elitism, non-transparency, jargon, acronyms and acrimony held sway (the official Climate Summit orientation document contains many pages of  definitions of arcane code words for various negotiation categories and processes), events at the Klimaforum 09 and in Christiania have been characterized by egalitarian, cooperative, friendly events and processes demonstrating the democratic, bottom-up spirit the ‘movement of movements’ is committed to embody.

References to COP15 dominated Copenhagen’s landscape, with globes, banners, billboard and advertising displays about the climate talks everywhere.  Huge posters emblazoned with ‘Hopenhagen’ festooned every bus stop and metro station, advertising would-be ‘climate-friendly’ corporate sponsors from Siemans and Vesta to Coca Cola.  But one series of adverts seemed to inadvertently, yet ironically, capture the attitude of many of the summit’s governmental and corporate participants.  Promoting some kind of fancy alcoholic drink , the glossy posters portrayed expensively dressed couples in various tableaus suggesting sexual intercourse, accompanied by the slogan ‘Party now. Apologize later.’

Voices from the Climate Bottom

Thanks to former European Parliamentarian Else Hammerich, our long-time friend and hostess with whom we stayed during our time here, we began our coverage of events, appropriately enough, in Christiania.  This famous enclave of counter-culture in the heart of Copenhagen is an expansive former military base taken over in the sixties of the last century by ‘hippies’ who transformed it into an embodiment of egalitarian community, democracy and liberatory life-style that has managed to maintain some of its original funky character despite continuous pressure from the surrounding forces of officialdom.  Numerous signs proclaim that both cameras and hard drugs are prohibited.

In what turned out to be a preview of coming events in the streets, as we approached the main entrance to Christiania, which is decorated by a fanciful mural portraying fairies and fecund lifeforms, we encountered a large group of police in riot gear exiting the gate – apparently making a show of force.  Later in the week, a celebratory dance in the enclave would suffer an unprovoked attack by the ‘Politi,’ who fired teargas directly at the crowd and carried out ‘preventative arrests’ of many activists.  But the place was peaceful enough during our visit as we wended our way through streets lined with colorfully decorated shops and living spaces and shared by mostly young folks clustered around bonfires and a large contingent of free-range dogs.

After a quick lunch in one of the community’s many restaurants we found our way to a large circus tent where Else, who founded the Danish Center for Conflict Resolution (http://www.konfliktloesning.dk/), moderated a panel on non-violence, one of many events scheduled in a two-week program titled ‘The Climate Bottom Conference.’  Else’s panel was followed with a talk by African-American constitutional law professor Sandra Ruffin.

A Harvard graduate from the class just ahead of Obama’s, Dr. Ruffin laid out what she saw as the many structural and political constraints within which the US President labors.  It turned out to be a prescient analysis of his actual performance at the Climate Summit ten days later, caught between the mythic projections and impossible expectations of an adoring global public and the retrograde burden of an obdurate Congress and a benighted American populace misled by denialist propaganda.  As Professor Ruffin summed it up, “Reality is a bitch.”

A Festival of Realities and Possibilities

Klimaforum 09, an ‘alternate climate summit’ held in a huge conference center in central Copenhagen, served as the main focal point of the  convergence of activists and intellectuals from around the world.  The rich program was packed from dawn to midnight every day for two weeks with concurrent events on every conceivable issue area representing the full spectrum of challenges and solutions confronting humanity in this evolutionary moment.  The crowded halls and sessions teemed with indigenous people in native dress, young people wielding video cameras, laptops and cellphones, and activists wearing costumes and sporting signs presenting their favorite cause.  We never saw a single suit.

Luminaries, journalists and experts of every stripe and focus rushed about looking for the locations of their next scheduled presentation.  We rushed about trying to video tape as much of the rich harvest as we could with hardly any time to catch up on jetlag, much less edit our recordings for posting on-line.  What we did manage to process and upload are available for viewing on our YouTube channel at: http://www.youtube.com/eon3 .   More will follow in coming days.  The presentations have lasting value for all those working for a just and peaceful transition to a post-carbon future.  Please stay tuned.

Don’t Nuke the Climate!

The most sobering presentations were those detailing the tragic impacts of industrial corporatism-caused climate change on indigenous people on every continent and in every island group.  One wonders if arch denialists, like US Senator James Inhofe, had the intellectual courage to sit through any one of the many presentations on this topic during Klimaforum, how their ecopathic worldview could possible remain intact.  The plethora of examples are too numerous to detail in this limited space.

But, for example, the International Forum on Globalization’s Claire Greensfelder chaired a panel of indigenous and minority activists from around the world detailing the catastrophic impacts of uranium mining and the nuclear fuel cycle on their various cultures, people and ecosystems.  (www.dont-nuke-the-climate.org )

From the American Southwest to Alaska; from Niger to Kazakhstan; from uranium mines in Australia and India to reprocessing plants in France, Japan and the State of Georgia, indigenous and minority communities testify to horrendous health and environmental devastation that shows the current industry push for a ‘nuclear renaissance’ to be nothing less than genocidal.

Inhofe, who boasts of having killed Kyoto and of his intent to kill any future climate treaty, had the temerity to make a cameo appearance the COP15.  One of the few reporters at his impromptu news conference told him, ‘You’re ridiculous.’  From the indigenous point of view, Inhofe and his ilk are far worse than merely ridiculous; they’re deluded homicidal maniacs on a mass global scale.

Other realities that blow holes in the denialist illusion are the proliferating populations of climate refugees fleeing sea rise, flooding, and glacier-melt-caused drought.  Mary Beth interviewed young Maasai filmmaker Jemimah Maitei Kerenge, a participant in the Conversations with the Earth project, which trains indigenous people to in video production.  She tells about the dire situation of her drought-devastated people.  Their ancient culture, like many others around the world is being destroyed by climate change, their animals are dying and they are being forced to migrate, all 700,000 of them, out of their ancestral lands in Kenya into neighboring countries.  ( For more info: http://www.conversationsearth.org/ )

Planetarian Prospects

Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci famously admitted to having ‘pessimism of the intellect, but optimism of the will.’  Despite the many causes for discouragement coming out of the fifteenth year of the UN’s Conference of the Parties here in Copenhagen, Gramsci’s quip captures my mood as we pack for the homeward journey.  The Copenhagen Convergence has confirmed my awareness that never before in human history have so many activists, on so many issues, on so many levels, on every continent, and in every island group, been at work.  The immune response of the planetary body politic is alive and well in thousands of initiatives all around the world.

We encountered two of my two personal favorites on the penultimate day of the Klimaforum as it became more and more evident that negotiations at the official Summit were melting down despite the long and grueling efforts of many sincere governmental and civil society negotiators.  One comes from British barrister Polly Higgins, who gave her analysis of the current planetary state of affairs, drawing the parallels between the arguments put forth by slave traders of yesteryear in the face of the ultimately successful abolition movement and those being put forth by the cap-n-trade corporate capitalists of today.  They are exactly the same.

In response, Ms. Higgins is advocating a ‘planet rights’ approach, following the lead of Bolivia and Ecuador, and modeled on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and has launched a campaign to establish the right-to-exist of all life-forms in binding international law.  You can find out more about her ‘Peoples Declaration’ at: http://www.treeshaverightstoo.com .

My other personal favorite is an initiative launched by our old friend Jakob von Uexkull, founder of the Right Livelihood Award, also known as the ‘Alternative Nobel Prize.’  His new project, the World Future Council, is dedicated to the rights of future generations.  You can find out more at: http://www.worldfuturecouncil.org/

The Parable of the Mastodon

The Copenhagen Convergence represents a coming together of single-issue activists in the process of realizing that whatever their main concern – women’s rights, indigenous rights, water, energy, food, agriculture, peace and disarmament, environmental justice, debt cancelation, uranium mining, tar sands, chemical and electromagnetic pollution, the abolition of nuclear power and weapons, you name it – the underlying cause is the top-down, full-spectrum dominance of the current system of  globalized corporate capitalism.

And further, that the solutions to all these evolutionary challenges all involve the same remedy: capital punishment for unregulated corporate capitalism – an end to ‘market-based,’ profit-motivated non-solutions and comodification of the planetary commons.  It is as if a group of blind people have, without realizing it, each had a hold of some appendage of a wooly mastodon in the throes of causing its own extinction.

Hopenhagen or Hoplesshagen?

As the Norse mythology version of 2012 has it, Ragnarok is the great battle at the end of an era,  the ‘twilight of the gods’  brought about by the temporary triumph of the forces of evil, resulting in various natural disasters, the inundation of the world in water, followed by the re-emergence of a new and fertile world repopulated by the two remaining human survivors.  I have been painfully reminded of that myth as an apt metaphor as I watched so-called Climate Summit events unfold here in Copenhagen over the past two weeks.  Preemptive, brutal police repression of non-violent, mostly young activists who have converged in their thousands; official paranoia in the face of mass dissent and its equation with ’subversion’ and ‘terrorism; shameful short-sighted game-playing and posturing by governmental negotiators.

It is not hard to make the case that what we have been witnessing here in frigid Denmark is indeed the twilight of the gods of globalized corporate capitalism, as Obama flies away in carbon-spewing Air Force One having brokered a non-binding, face-saving deal that is, in fact, no deal at all.
But that’s only half the story, the fading shot of an historic cross-dissolve.  To my mind what we are also witnessing is the continuation of a birthing process begun even before the ‘Battle of Seattle;’ the maturation of a ‘movement of movements’ and the emergence of a new ‘planetarian paradigm’ the implications of which will become ever more powerfully evident in the coming months and years.
===========
James Heddle is co-director with Mary Beth Brangan of EON – the Ecological Options Network (www.EON3.net and www.YouTube.com/EON3 ).  His e-mail is jim@EON3.net
____________________________
EON
The Ecological Options Network
“Documenting Deep Democracy”
Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 21, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 13, Dec. 19, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

Dec. 19, 2009


Photograph: Jens Norgaard Larsen/EPA
 

by Eleanore Despina:

Saturday, Dec. 19, was our last day in Copenhagen. We flew out to Budapest early in the morning to visit friends.  But we had watched through the night as news came out about the meeting of the 25 major countries and the agreement that they drafted and presented to the COP for a very brief consideration.

These powerful nations co-opted the process and proposed an agreement that was not arrived at democratically through the UN.  It felt like a betrayal of the process, the 15 UN-sanctioned meetings between 1992 and now, and all the people and nations that worked together toward to a fair and binding deal.  It was a huge disappointment.

I don’t feel optimistic about the climate.  We’ve left COP15 without a binding agreement, with no emissions caps, with only a vague goal to keep temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius (though that’s better than I expected, there is no proposed way to get there) and some vague financial commitments.  A team of climate modelers who were there projected that, under this agreement, we will rise from 387 parts per million carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, to over 700 ppm in this century.  If you’re reading this, I’m sure you know that our target is 350 ppm.

But just as we didn’t have any choice about action before we went, we don’t have any choice now.  Because we didn’t get a good agreement, it’s more necessary than ever to work locally, nationally and internationally with every ally we can find to slow global warming.  I’m hoping Copenhagen increased awareness of this critical issue and that the team working on climate change will grow to include every woman, man and child on the planet, till we cannot be ignored.

Once again I want to mention the huge number of NGOs and individuals who converged on Copenhagen with a common goal: to get a fair, ambitious and binding climate agreement.  These groups were from every interest area in the political spectrum – poverty, gender equality, environmental justice – you name it.  And they were organized into affinity networks of groups from around the world.  Many have superb organizing and communications skills and I was really impressed with their effectiveness.

A leader was Climate Action Network (CAN) but there were many others that deserve participation and support from people who care about the climate.  Consider making a contribution to CAN or another that you like, because they all have huge work to do in 2010, before the talks in Mexico City.  Many will also be working to pass an energy bill in the Senate here in the US by the fortieth Earth Day in April, 2010.  These effective peoples’ lobbying groups and networks are our best hope for the future.

by Bing Gong:

I am still digesting and assimilating the past two weeks in Copenhagen during the climate negotiations, what’s next and where to concentrate our energies.

It is good that I am going to sit in a 5-day meditation retreat the first week of January.  In Japanese, it is called a sesshin, literally “gathering of the heart-mind” to settle and calm the mind, to reflect and see clearly the path ahead.

I am feeling sad and disappointed, having put high hopes on Obama coming in on a white horse and saving the day. But perhaps we should not blame Obama, but the constraints put upon him by the American political process, specifically a few recalcitrant Republican senators that are holding the planet hostage.  He could not have proclaimed targets ahead of what Congress has passed.  We have to remember Clinton signing the Kyoto Protocols, only to have it defeated in the Senate by a 95 to 0 vote back in 1997.  We need to put all our efforts towards passing a strong, robust energy bill in the Senate this spring, putting pressure on those senators.

Seeking advice, insights and wisdom of the I Ching, I threw the coins on Friday, on this ponderous occasion, the day the heads of state gathered in Copenhagen to decide the fate of the biosphere, life on the planet, humans with all our fellows creatures, fish in the oceans and the forests.  And here is what came up:

Critical Mass – Preponderance of the Great (Hexagram 28) says:

“In an atom, when CRITICAL MASS is reached, it is a time when heavy particles are occupying the same space, thereby creating extraordinary events and catastrophic chain reactions.  In much the same way, the current situation is becoming weighed with a great many considerations.  There are numerous decisions pending, the air is full of ideas with all their ensuing multifarious possibilities and the ponderous affairs of the people around you are pushing into the foreground.  All of it is important, serious, and meaningful and all of it is coming to a head right now.” [The situation now]

[Perhaps the desired situation from the changing lines] Cosmic Order – The Caldron (Hexagram 50) says:

The relationship between the development of the individual and the needs of the cosmos demonstrates the meaning of COSMIC ORDER.  When the two are in harmony, COSMIC ORDER exists, human potential is enhanced and many things flourish.  Such harmony can be illustrated by the beneficial relationships between a man and his superior or society and its leaders.  Scholars consider this hexagram a strong indicator of harmonious accord with the cosmos.

At this time, the decisions of leaders and politicians are wise and well regarded…In general, those ideas that you currently hold most valuable are indeed worthwhile.  Whatever sacrifices you must make to attain your ideals will be rewarded and your success will confirm the worthiness of your venture, thus reinforcing your confidence.

…You will begin to perceive what is actually possible for you to achieve and not waste precious energies on the impossible, those things that are not in accord with the COSMIC ORDER, given the circumstances of your life…You can plan your strategies for the attainment of ambitious goals by acting in harmony with the energy and bearing of the cosmos.” - from the I Ching Workbook, by R.L. Wing

Mary Beth Brangan and James Heddle, of Bolinas and the Ecological Options Network, were also in Copenhagen documenting many of the side events and the march.  Mary Beth, James,  Eleanore and I will be be on the Post Carbon radio program,  with Bernie Stephan,  to report back on our experiences in Copenhagen.  Tune in Monday, December 28th at 1:00 pm on KWMR.
90.5 FM in Point Reyes Station, 89.9 FM in Bolinas.  Streaming live on the web at: kwmr.org (click on the “On Air” icon). Archived on our website: www.wmpostcarbon.com

Sign the online petition at www.postcarbon.com to demand world leaders get it right.

Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 17, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 11, Dec. 17, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

Dec. 17, 2009


Day 11, Thursday, Dec. 17, 2009

Our time in Copenhagen is drawing to a close.  It is an historic moment, the stakes could not be higher in this “poker” game that nations are playing. The 120 heads of state are now arriving to determine the outcome of the climate negotiations. Will we get a fair, ambitious, and legally binding agreement that meets what science demands that will save the planet from global warming?

This is the drama that is enfolding here these last two days of the negotiations. At this time the divisions between developed and developing nations seem unbridgeable, but one can only hope that there will be a miracle at the last moment. There will no doubt be some sort of political settlement and shell of a framework that they will try to pass off as a successful outcome, called “greenwashing” here in Copenhagen. They are already talking about working out the final details out next year in Mexico City.

This post written by Bing Gong.

LISTEN to an interview with Bing Gong on KWMR, by Lyons Filmore, Dec. 16, 2009 [24:24 min]:

WATCH the live UNFCC Webcast of delegates speaking. [Don't forget to select the  "English" tab.]

WATCH Jim Heddle and MaryBeth Brangan of EON3, Ecological Options Network, interview Debi Barker, International Program Director of the Washington, D.C.-based, nonprofit, Center For Food Safety on Dec. 16, 2009. Debi explains how organic, ecological, regenerative agriculture can make a major contribution to mitigating climate change. A total switch to organic farming could eliminate 25% of emissions in the U.S. now caused by the use of artificial fertilizers. She points out that the UNFCC is focusing on expensive, and some unproven ways to mitigate climate change, whereas a switch to organic agriculture could make a big difference inexpensively.

Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 16, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 10, Dec. 16, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

Dec. 16, 2009

photo by Lindsay Cray, WSC-SD

Day 10, Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2009

Today’s entry by Eleanore Despina

Today was a tough day – perhaps you saw some of it on TV, the demonstrators at Bella Center were expressing their frustration over being excluded from the venue.  I actually think it was amazing that all of us got into Bella Center in the first place and doubt it will ever happen again.  The place holds 15,000 people and there were 37,000 from NGOs here in Copenhagen.  And of course that doesn’t include all the negotiators and press- there were thousands of both of those.

Congressman Waxman’s representative, who as you can imagine is quite committed to a good climate deal, was very frustrated by the NGO presence in the hall, saying that it interfered with the negotiators’ ability to do their job and that NGOs should have been given a hall of their own.

I felt that it was really important that civil society be present in the hall, but I’m sorry about these late-stage demonstrations because they probably mean that NGOs will be excluded from future COPs.  At the same time, I certainly appreciate the demonstrators’ frustration with the lack of progress in the talks and with the really wishy washy standards that appear to be on the table.  The great thing is the opportunity that NGOs have had to organize here.  Even the funders are organizing!  The meetings we’ve been to focus heavily on networking and creating a strategy for the next year or two with like-minded organizations.

I think this is only the middle of the “Copenhagen” process.  It’s scheduled to continue in Mexico City next November, but Al Gore (who spoke to the funders’ group today) is hoping to see that meeting moved up to August, or even July.  He’s hoping that will push Congress to pass a climate bill on Earth Day and that Congress will ratify a treaty before next November’s election, when the demos are almost certain to lose seats, making ratification that much harder.   Apparently, he’s already talked with Caldaron about this and it could be done.

But what’s going to change between now and next summer that’s going to give us a better climate deal?  They’ll have to confer day and night for six months to clear up the distrust and animosity between the developed and developing nations. Of course, if the US did pass a climate bill, that would give the other countries some confidence that we’re willing to bind ourselves to some standards for carbon emissions and it would show that we might ratify a climate treaty, which other nations are worrying that we’ll fail to do.  That would solve at least some of the problems, perhaps encouraging all parties that there can be measurable, reportable and verifiable standards (MRVs) which most parties are calling for.

Other notes from the Gore talk:

1.  While he considers reality our biggest ally, we need to make the climate crisis personal and urgent.  We are actually on an astonishingly short time line, but this us just not apparent to people, and especially to our leaders, who are mostly older and focused on other important and seemingly more immediate problems like the economy and healthcare.

2.  However, with the carbon caps being proposed here in Copenhagen, we are on a trajectory toward 700 parts per million of atmospheric carbon by 2100.  That is twice the safe level (350) and close to twice the carbon in the atmosphere (387) right now.

3.  Right now, we are putting 90 tons of carbon in the atmosphere every 24 hours!!!  Almost all of this is from industries which, in Gore’s words, “rely on the right they have to dump carbon pollution into the atmosphere for free.”  He sees it as being exactly like polluting a river or the air with particulates, only with consequences which are much more difficult to reverse.

4.  Gore is happy about the forest protection treaty, REDD, though forest people are not happy about it at all, saying that they will be evicted from their lands and livelihoods (most tribes have no legal title, though they’ve lived on their lands for hundreds of years) and that they are the proper stewards of the forests.

We’ve learned that there about about 370,000,000 indigenous peoples on the planet in about 5,000 “nations.”  They feel unrepresented by the governments of the lands in which they dwell and are demanding a voice in the negotiations, as they are the populations which are most vulnerable to climate change.  These people live in the rain forests, at the poles, and in other areas which have been difficult to industrialize, which is why they’ve been able to keep their traditional way of life for so long.  I don’t understand all the implications of REDD for them, but I’d like to know more.  370 million people is nothing to sneeze at – and we may be discounting their right to exist.

Okay, I’ve worn out my fingers for tonight.  Tomorrow we have a couple of meetings about the progress (or lack thereof) in the negotiations and there is a panel on forests that I’m hoping to go to in the evening, if I can find the place.

LISTEN to the speech by Al Gore [1:01:50 min. Gore speech begins at 4:45]

Excerpts:

Many industries [resist climate reform] whose business models work well as long as the atmosphere is a free sewer for dumping…We dump 90 million tons every 24 hours.

As a threat, it’s unprecedented. We confuse unprecedented with the unlikely and the improbable. Exceptions can kill you.

[The threat] masquerades as an abstraction and a problem that gives us the luxury of time. Its urgency is concealed…We are hardwired evolutionarily to respond to short-term thinking…If a snake slithered in,  we wouldn’t debate it.

This threat doesn’t activate our hard-wired instincts. It needs the pre-frontal cortex…it requires an act of will, a choice. It requires a considered sense of urgency.

Right-wing cable, television, and talk radio…some hold a different reality that excludes respect for the scientific method and the consensus painstakingly arrived at by the world scientific community.

Most people in parliamentary democracies have grown in a culture that honors the role of reason and have found it to be the best guide for collective decisions but that has been jettisoned by some that have been tempted by the power of these neo-feudal groups.

The average American watches TV 5 hours per day. This is a comment about the attention and passion available for democracy. The conversations over the back fence, attendance at community meetings, involvement with politics, discussions with friends of what the right thing to do is…they’re watching Dancing with the Stars.

If you spent five hours a day playing tennis, you’d develop considerable muscles. If you spent five hours a day watching television, what muscles are you developing? I don’t know, but it’s not the democracy muscle.

For the latest happenings at the COP15, WATCH the Live UNFCCC Webcast.

Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 15, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 9, Dec. 15, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

Dec. 15, 2009


photo by Bing Gong

Day 9, Tuesday, December 15
Bing and I took a half-day off today – somewhat by accident.  We slept past the time to get to our morning briefing (unfortunately, as they are very educational) and there was no other event till 4 p.m.  So I got to wash my hair and do some laundry, and generally move a bit slower than we’ve been doing during this intense period.

Right now it’s snowing big, hard flakes and Bing just asked me for the definition of a blizzard!  The snow isn’t sticking yet, but I’m hoping it will.  It’s gotten very cold the last two days.  Our faces sting as we walk from place to place.
Yesterday was probably our last day at the climate negotiations.  Today they are further rationing the entry passes and tomorrow they cut admission of non-negotiators to practically nothing, take down the booths and probably close the side events (gatherings and presentations by non-governmental organizations, NGOs) – all in anticipation of the arrival of the heads of state.
We aren’t hopeful that a good agreement will come out of Copenhagen, but I think it’s been a very important two weeks.  Here are my reasons:
1.  NGOs have had the organizing opportunity of a lifetime.  There have been 37,000 NGO participants just at Bella Center, where the negotiations have been taking place.  There are also thousands at Klimaforum, another venue – mostly younger people who weren’t at Bella Center.  So about 60,000 people were interested enough to make the trip here, and those people will go home and educate many others through their organizations.

2.  Continuing on the NGO subject, the organizations have cross-educated each other.  People are calling this the “movement of movements.”  Gender groups, indigenous people’s groups, islander nation groups, vegan groups, faith-based groups and many, many others are sharing their climate agendas. I think all these groups are actually necessary and integral to the process of lessening the effect of climate change.  The movement is calling for global reform and that starts with understanding the needs beyond our national boarders and the agendas of groups with which we are totally unfamiliar.  I really hope that the NGOs and individuals here will carry home not only their deepened understanding of the needs of their own groups or cultures, but the messages/needs of others they’ve learned of here, as well.

3.  I believe that negotiators have also be educated by the side events, booths, and interactions that I’ve described above.  An example is that the island nations have stuck firmly to a target of 1.5 degrees Celsius in temperature increase.  And through a side event put on by Conversations with the Earth, everyone has been able to see how many island people are effected by sea level rise, how salt water is already sweeping clear across their islands during storms, killing their crops and causing wide-spread hunger.  This is causing the whole group to re-evaluate their temperature targets. I think few people had hope that a target temperature increase of 2 degrees would be agreed to, but I think that’s now quite feasible (though probably at a later meeting, not Copenhagen).  That low a target will create a much more Fair, Ambitious and Binding (FAB) deal.

4.  However, there are many unfairnesses and misunderstandings left to educate about and work through.  Many are saying this is only the beginning, and I think that’s true in the sense that there is so much that’s been learned here that needs to be disseminated all over the world.  Then the world can continue to bring pressure – globally, in home countries, and locally – for true equity, to save our planetary climate and peoples.

Well, I thought I had more time than I do.  Bing is putting things into bags and zipping up zippers, and any minute he’ll snatch this computer from under my fingers.  I’ll try to continue these thoughts later.  I miss you all and hope that you are well and not too stressed by the run-up to Christmas.  I send you love!
Eleanore

Channel Icon

WATCH: video by EON’s Jim Heddle and Mary Beth Brangan on Angela Navarro,  Bolivia’s embattled, heroic climate justice negotiator, as she makes her case on what and why the North owes the South at Klimaforum 09, the alternative climate summit in Copenhagen, Dec. 10, 2009.

Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 14, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 8, Dec. 14, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

Dec. 14, 2009

Going into Day 8, this is where the issues stand in Copenhagen.

WATCH:  Copenhagen Climate Negotiation News Update: Today @ COP15- Day 07

Analysis of events on Monday, Day 8, Dec. 14, 2009

Delegation members from Lesotho (R) talk prior a meeting at the Plenary Tycho Brahe of the Bella center of Copenhagen. …delegates walked out of key talks and continental giant Nigeria warned the negotiations were now on red alert. (AFP/Attila Kisbenedek)

Copenhagen Chaos: Developing Countries Insist Kyoto Stays; UN and Danish hosts rush to repair rift as G77 delegate claims scrapping Kyoto would mean “killing of Africa,” by Terna Gyuse, CommonDreams.org, Dec. 14, 2009.

Excerpts:

One of the day’s early press conferences found the Africa Group unhappy with the way the formal discussions are being structured. The group spoke against an order of business that seems to follow a developed country preference to discuss a single track for negotiations. Africa prefers to continue with parallel discussions that would preserve the imperfect but legally-binding structure of the Kyoto Protocol while negotiations continue over a binding replacement for the long term. By the middle of the day, the Africa Group’s displeasure had brought official talks to a halt.

China and other major polluters from the developing world have proposed only conservative targets for reducing emissions – failure that is linked to the reluctance of developed countries to pledge significant funding to the roughly $200 billion a year that will be needed for adaptation, mitigation, technology transfers and capacity building.

As growing numbers of ministers arrived in Denmark, the Climate Action Network stressed that the biggest failure thus far was political leadership.

Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 14, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 7, Dec. 13, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

Dec. 13, 2009


photo by Bing Gong

Day 7, Sunday, Dec. 13, 2009: Today we went to the Imperial Hotel where we met for a briefing on the climate negotiations with the Climate and Energy Funders Group, a delegation of around 40 funders from the US who are here for the final week of the UNFCCC.  Because Eleanore and I are trustees of a small foundation, The Lia Fund, we will join in on their schedule of planned briefings and events.  It is fortunate for us because we are privy to briefings from experts who are well acquainted with the negotiation process, all the issues such as climate justice, market-based schemes and all the arcane language used inside the Bella Center and in all of the NGO’s and Civil Society outside.

Representatives from the Climate Action Network International and other organizations provided a brief overview of the first week of negotiations, describing the positions and role in the negotiations of the major nations and negotiating blocks-US, EU, China, Latin America Countries (LAC), Africa, and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)- and synthesized global perspectives. This orientation stressed the international nature of the negotiations.

Following the briefing, there was a Climate Equity orientation session where key civil society organizers reviewed the schedule of events, helped explain what to expect and answered questions.  Among those present were Victor Menotti, Executive Director of the International Forum on Globalization, who has been working to build a consensus and solidarity among NGOs and indigenous peoples to strengthen their position.  Indigenous peoples are among the first victims of the impacts of climate change, their way of life depending on subsisting closely with nature.  They have lived thousands of years in sustainable ways with the earth and have much to teach us about living in harmony with nature.  Their lands often have resources, forests and oil that are coveted by greedy corporations and governments.  Climate justice demands that they have a seat at the table and be consulted to determine the fate of their livelihoods.

In this session, one of my heroes, Naomi Klein, Canadian journalist and author of the Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, spoke on the birth of a “movement of movements” that is being birthed here in Copenhagen.

LISTEN to Naomi Klein, speaking on reparations and repairing the world to prevent the “globalization of Katrina,” Dec. 13, 2009 [6:10 min]:



Naomi Klein
photo by Google images

READ:  Climate Rage, by Naomi Klein, Rolling Stone, November 11th, 2009.

Illustration by Tim Bower, from Rolling Stone

Excerpt:

As it stands, the U.S. and other Western nations are engaged in a lose-lose game of chicken with developing nations like India and China: We refuse to lower our emissions unless they cut theirs and submit to international monitoring, and they refuse to budge unless wealthy nations cut first and cough up serious funding to help them adapt to climate change and switch to clean energy. “No money, no deal,” is how one of South Africa’s top environmental officials put it.

WATCH: Climate Bottom Voices, video from EON, by Jim Heddle and Marybeth Brangan, our own Transition West Marin enthusiasts, bringing the live action in Copenhagen back to us via video.

Excerpts from Climate Bottom Voices:

Over at the Bella Center, a particular model of dealing with climate change is dying. It is revealing itself before the world as nothing more than a final scramble for the remaining resources of a planet in peril.

-Naoimi Klein, author, Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism

…our impending ecological crisis is being reduced to a single molecule of CO2. This is an extremely reductionist view of looking at nature…part of the reason GMOs have been propagated through the companies is because…a unit of life was identified and called a gene, was commodified and marketed.

We’re seeing the same thing happening with a molecule of CO2….with carbon trading markets. This emphasis on carbon is a distration from having a holistic understanding of naure, of ecology, of possible eco-system collapse and …distracts us from challenging what industrial capitalism has developed and brought forward to us.

-Ali Tanna, Bio-scientist, UC Berkeley

WATCH: Seattle to Copenhagen, Building a Movement of Movements, another video from EON, by Jim Heddle and Marybeth Brangan that outlines the issues being negotiated in Copenhagen. Recorded at an International Forum on Globalization panel discussion, From Seattle to Copenhagen, San Francisco, Nov. 23, 2009.

In the lead-up to the Copenhagen Climate Summit 10 activists and authors trace the history of the climate justice movement from the reactive ‘no!’ of the Battle of Seattle to the proactive, solution oriented ‘yes’ of the Copenhagen convergence.
Speakers:
Jerry Mander, Victor Menotti and Claire Greensfelder, IFG
Anuradha Mittal, Oakland Institute
Paul Hawken, David Solnit and Rebecca Solnit, local author-activists
Jia Ching Chen, Youth-of-Color Organizer
Kevin Danaher, Global Exchange
Tim Robertson, California Fair Trade Coalition

Excerpts from Seattle to Copenhagen, Building a Movement of Movements:

Corporations have written the rules for themselves and have taken the people out of the process...Seattle was about containing corporate power. Copenhagen and the climate process is where we set ecological limits on the global economy.

-Victor Menotti

With Copenhagen, the issues at play are beyond the control of any government. I don’t think government can handle it. Governments bring up the rear. The way you heal a system is you connect more part to itself. Civil society connects more of humanity to itself…the rule of civil society is absolutely critical in making this transition…

-Paul Hawken

The problem hasn’t stopped.The juggernaut of planetary destruction, corporate domination, expansionist economics-the fundamental root causes of the problem- were not yet fully revealed as far more systemic.

Now we have a triple crisis, three linking gigantic problems that are all related: 1. global climate change, 2. global resource depletion and 3. peak oil- the diminishing of the supply of cheap fossil fuel resources.

Those three are interlocked and caused by the same problems: over use of resources, an economy that absolutely depends on constant expansion and the ideology of economic growth which is also the ideology of capitalism.

Economic growth depends on ever-expanding resources, ever-expanding markets and ever-expanding supplies of cheap labor. There’s no way around that, that’s the intrinsic problem. We have to start speaking systemically.

Is an economic system based on ever-expanding growth even possible on a finite planet? It’s preposterous…The econmic system instrinsically is up against the limits of the planet…[we need to] recognize the limits and carrying capacity of the earth and shape our economic and political models within that framework.

How do you move from a system which has built in destruction of the planet and built in devastation for local communities and local economies and transition back to systems which formerly worked and new environmentally sustainable systems? That’s the project of our time.

-Jerry Mander

Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 12, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 6, Dec. 12, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina

of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

December 12, 2009


photo by Bing Gong

Civil Society on the March

Day 6, Saturday, December 12, 2009.
Today I marched with tens of thousands of people.  The estimate of number of marchers ranges from 80,000 to 100,000. I was reminded of Seattle in 1999 of how Civil Society, a coalition of environmentalists, trade unions and social justice groups changed the course of the global dominance by the WTO over national, state and local governments.

The march from the Hall of Parliament to the Bella Center was massive and lively. The negotiators inside know that they were being watched and are feeling the heat from a Civil Society that wants an agreement in line with the science, that is fair and just and legally binding.

In fact the acronym FAB, for a Fair, Ambitious and Binding deal, is being heard everywhere in Copenhagen. It has perhaps originated with the countries of the global South. A fair deal is one that contains financial mechanisms that allow the developing countries to jump over dirty energy and go straight to developing clean technologies to advance the growth of their industries.

An ambitious deal is one with a low target for temperature increase – perhaps as low as 1.5 degrees, which the Island Nations and Africa are hoping will allow their survival. And a binding deal is one that binds all parties to ascertainable and committed goals, with monitoring, rather than just to voluntary standards.

Many here feel that, with 100 world leaders showing up late in the week, Copenhagen has to read as “a success.” The question is, will it be a true success, or just greenwashing? As an example, the current goal of 20-25% reduction in carbon over US 2005 emissions by 2020 translates to only a 4-5% reduction over 1990 emissions. 1990 is the base year the rest of the world is using. So the US target using 2005 emissions as a baseline is a very significant example of greenwashing. The US needs to talk in terms of 1990 emissions to be in the same conversation as the rest of the world!

Climate Action Rally Album

Photos by Bing Gong

[Click on photo above for more photos]
Album includes photos of the Climate Action March and Rally on Saturday, December 12th, in Copenhagen, to tell our leaders that global civil society wants a fair, ambitious and binding agreement with real solutions.

Kumi Naidoo’s Speech at the COPenhagen Global Day of Action

Executive Director of Green Peace International, Kumi Naidoo, delivered a passionate speech at the launch of the Global Day of Action March from the Hall of Parliament downtown to the Bella Center, the site of the UN climate negotiations in Copenhagen, 12 Dec. 2009.
“Yes we can, yes we must and yes we will deliver a fair efficient and legally binding treaty to protect the future of our children!”
WATCH KUMI NAIDOO’S SPEECH:

Vandana Shiva at the Climate Rally

photo by Bing Gong

LISTEN to Vandana Shiva, environmental activist, eco-feminist, International Forum on Globalization, speak at the Climate Rally [6:24 min]:

Excerpts:

I come from the Himalayas. Our glaciers are melting. 70% of the streams in my area have dried up…

The time has long passed for big Capital to make more money. The earth must call the shots. The earth will write the rules.

40% of the solution to climate change lies in organic, ecological farming in the hands of small farmers. That is also the 100% solution to hunger and poverty. ..

It’s not the car but the bicycle that is the future. It’s not GMOs but organic farming that is the future.

Corporate rule has had its day…To the corporations and their friends in some governments, we want to say, your time is over. A new world is being born. We will build this new world. We will compel the corrupt governments to stop…contaminating the atmosphere…We have the power…and no one is going to stop us.

<table style=”width:194px;”><tr><td align=”center” style=”height:194px;background:url(http://picasaweb.google.com/s/c/transparent_album_background.gif) no-repeat left”><a href=”http://picasaweb.google.com/twmphotos/ClimateActionRally?feat=embedwebsite”><img src=”http://lh3.ggpht.com/_zx1t4SlEBhI/SyRn9IX_YhE/AAAAAAAAAog/nXCJyC_bGqA/s160-c/ClimateActionRally.jpg” width=”160″ height=”160″ style=”margin:1px 0 0 4px;”></a></td></tr><tr><td style=”text-align:center;font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:11px”><a href=”http://picasaweb.google.com/twmphotos/ClimateActionRally?feat=embedwebsite” style=”color:#4D4D4D;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;”>Climate Action Rally</a></td></tr></table>
Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 11, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 5, Dec. 11, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina
of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

December 11, 2009

Photo by Bing Gong

Day 5, Friday, Dec. 11, 2009
Today we went to Klimaforum09, the alternative peoples’ climate meeting, the global civil society counterpart of the official UN conference in the Bella Center.

From the Klimaforum website:
One of the central outcomes of Klimaforum09 will be a global climate declaration expressing the hopes, ideas, and visions of citizens groups and social movements from all corners of the planet.

The fear is that the official climate deal likely to come out the UN conference in Copenhagen will be focused on “technological fixes” and biased towards the interests of the corporate lobby and the rich and powerful nations.

In contrast, the declaration to be finalized at Klimaforum09 will put forth a vision of a more socially just world society. In addition it will emphasize the need to create substantial changes in the social and economic structures of society in order to meet the challenges of global warming and food sovereignty.

When finished, the declaration will be handed over to the political leaders at the COP15 supplying them with inspiration as to how a fair and just climate deal can be put together. Above all the declaration will be another stepping stone in building of a planetary movement for climate justice.

At Klimaforum09, we attended a panel discussion, “Say No to GMOs: Why Genetically Modified Crops Are Not a Climate or Food Security Solution,” with Dr. Vandana Shiva of Navdanya International, Debbie Barker of Center for Food Safety and others. Just as the Nuclear Power industry wants to push Nuclear energy as a solution to the climate crisis, the Biotech industry (Monsanto) wants to push GMO’s as a solution to producing more food and drought-resistant and salt-resistant seeds as a solution to climate change.

LISTEN to the Say No To GMOs panel discussion [69:56 min]:

After leaving the panel discussion at Klimaforum09, we did some sight-seeing, walking through the Copenhagen Central Train Station and Tivoli, the famous amusement park.

Photo by Bing Gong
Posted by: transitionwestmarin | December 10, 2009

Copenhagen Diary, Day 4, Dec. 10, 2009

Copenhagen Diary

by Bing Gong & Eleanore Despina
of Point Reyes Station, CA, USA

December 10, 2009

Little Mermaid, Copenhagen Harbor  Photo by Nourar Aci-Scalabre

Copenhagen Diary by Eleanor Despina, Dec. 10, 2009
How do people  sacrifice a present they can see for a future they can only guess at?

It’s 4:30 in the afternoon and I’m preparing to go for a walk.  It is night here.  Night falls very slowly.  I think it began to fall around 2:30, and now the falling is complete.  And day comes very late: It is still dark at 8 a.m.  We haven seen the sun since we’ve been here, though there has been little rain.  San Francisco can’t compete with this city in the department of dark skies.

The street is a bit rainy right now, but no matter – it’s full of bicycles. This flat city is full of bikes at every hour of the day.  We’re told that 37 percent of Copenhagians commute to their jobs on bicycles.  It’s trendy, and it’s easy, not only because the city is flat, but also because bikes share equal rights with cars and pedestrians.  Their lanes are between the car lanes and the sidewalks, at an elevation just higher than the street, but lower than the sidewalks.

Copenhagen is aiming for 50% commuter use of bikes and will probably achieve it because bike travel is safe here. Most people don’t even wear helmets. The bike lanes have their own little traffic lights.  And traffic isn’t even very bad, because most other people are on the buses, not in cars.

The Danes also have no phobia about the appearance of windmills, and we’ve seen many along the harbor and outside Bella Center, where the climate talks are being held.  To me the modern windmills are beautiful, and I enjoy the unexpected sight of their sleek, silvery bodies.

Many glass bottles can be returned for refill, but we’ve been unable to determine whether we can recycle.  Garbage seems to go all in one can. We’ve been told that Denmark generates more waste than most other European countries, and perhaps there actually is no recycling other than bottle return. It’s impossible for me, without language skills, to determine for sure.

I stayed home from the talks today with a sore foot.  Yesterday, trying to read my conference schedule while walking, I missed a step.  I thought I had sprained my ankle but I think I’ve only bruised my foot.  I’m going out to test it now and hope tomorrow I’ll be back in action.  Lots of walking at the climate talks- among the displays from NGOs on all subjects, from farming to forests, and from all over the world – and from meetings of the Parties (mostly to arrange more meetings) to talks by a government, NGO, or group of indigenous groups.

Altogether, it forms a picture of the future that is very discouraging in light of the small effort our governments appear willing to make.  A San Franciscan from the Nature Conservancy put it frankly when he said he thinks we’ve already sacrificed the small islands and coastlines of much of the world, though few give voice to this.  We’re unwilling to face that we’ve put our Western way of life before the homelands of other cultures.

I think in our children’s lifetimes we will reap bitter fruit, as entire displaced nations ask for shelter.  But it’s difficult for people to sacrifice a present that they can see for a future they can only guess at.

Little Mermaid, Copenhagen Harbor  Photo by Nourar Aci-Scalabre

Day 4, December 10: Today Bing Gong attended a “Don’t Nuke the Climate” event. A member of the group taking this action was Claire Greensfelder, of International Forum on Globalization.

SEE more photos of this action on Flickr.

Text from Flickr:
Antinuclear action at the Little Mermaid; Nuclear power masks real solutions to climate crises
10 December 2009 – 10* *NGOs placed a radiation-protection mask on Copenhagen’s famous “Little Mermaid” in order to dramatize the dangers of the nuclear industry and the emphasize the necessity to phase out nuclear power.

READ Press Release from Don’t Nuke The Climate Activists, including Claire Greensfelder, at bottom of page.

LISTEN to statements of Don’t Nuke The Climate anti-nuclear activists [10:23 min.]

Victor Menotti, Google Images

LISTEN to interview with Victor Menotti,
Executive Director
International Forum on Globalization

by Bing Gong at the Bella Center,  Copenhagen, Denmark
Dec. 10, 2009
[6:49 min.]

Press Release: Don’t Nuke The Climate

ANTINUCLEAR ACTION AT THE LITTLE MERMAID
Nuclear power masks real solutions to climate crises

Copenhagen, 10 December 2009: On the fourth day of the two-week Copenhagen Climate Summit, eight environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from several countries who are all partners in the international « Don’t Nuke the Climate ! » campaign organized an action  to symbolize nuclear industry’s attempts to exploit the climate crisis for its own economic survival. At noon, the NGOs placed a radiation-protection mask on Copenhagen’s famous “Little Mermaid” in order to dramatize the dangers of the nuclear industry and the emphasize the necessity to phase out nuclear power.

Charlotte Mijeon of Sortir du Nucleaire France, said: “Just as the Denmark’s beloved mermaid is wearing a mask – we must all remember that nuclear power hinders the fight against global warming by masking the real solutions like solar, wind and wave power and depriving them from the major funding they deserve.”

Representatives also denounced greenwash attempts from their respective nuclear industries:

Claire Greensfelder of the International Forum on Globalization in the United States added: “During the Copenhagen Summit, decision-makers need not only to agree on ambitious climate targets, but also to refuse to accept and provide funding for false solutions such as nuclear power, so called “clean coal” and industrialized bio or agro-fuels.”

Sabine Bock, coordinator of energy and climate protection for Women in Europe for a Common Future (WECF)  said: “Nuclear energy has proven in the past that it is a threat not only to our health and the environment, but also to human rights. In our work at WECF with local communities, we have encountered severe health problems and human rights abuses of populations due to the harmful effects of nuclear energy and radiation. We can’t understand why governments still promote this dangerous technology rather than taking the opportunity to develop safe and sustainable new, renewable, and clean energy solutions.”

“Regrettably, an increasing number of states actually wish that nuclear power could be labelled as a solution to climate change,” added Vladimir Slivyak of Ecodefense Russia,  “If this energy system finds a place in the next agreement, then some States could attain their emissions cuts targets by selling reactors to developing countries.  This is a false solution on two counts:

1) By investing in a carbon offset in a developing country, the investing country is not actually making any effort to reduce their own production of greenhouse gases, thus avoiding the essential question of conservation.

2) the CDM would make nuclear power eligible for new, large amounts of public financing – financing that is more appropriately reserved for new, energy efficient, safe and clean technologies.

Finally, Karin Wurzbacher of Umweltinstitut München emphasized the major danger of massive new nuclear subsidies:  “In addition to spreading an extremely complex and expensive  technology all over the world, major nuclear energy development would increase the access to nuclear weapons capable materials and the serious danger of illegal nuclear weapons proliferation would dramatically increase.

“Pushing for nuclear as a climate solution is a shame”, concluded Peer de Rijk of WISE

The “Don’t Nuke the Climate!” campaign includes more than 350 organizations in 45 countries around the world.   Member organizations are campaigning for a global nuclear phase-out and calling attention to the fact that nuclear power is not only far too dangerous (due to radioactive waste, the risk of major accidents and the potential for proliferation), but also new construction and development would be much too slow to address the climate emergency.  Finally, nuclear power is just too expensive and inappropriate for meeting the energy needs of the Global South.

Should this technology be included in a climate agreement, it would deprive real solutions (e.g. energy efficiency and renewable energies) from much-needed financing. Resorting to nuclear power would doom the fight against global warming to fail.

Citizens from all countries are still invited to sign the « Don’t Nuke the Climate ! », petition — available in 10 languages at www.dont-nuke-the-climate.org and already supported by more than 50,000 people all over the world.

———————————————-

Photos:

available on : ftpperso.free.fr – login : sdnphotos – public09 and on

www.flickr.com/photos/43160621@N08/sets

Contacts:

- Charlotte Mijeon, Réseau “Sortir du nucléaire” (France): + 33 6 75 36 20 20 ; charlotte.mijeon@sortirdunucleaire.fr

- Peer De Rijk, WISE: + 31 6 20 000 626 ; wiseamster@antenna.nl

- Vladimir Slivyak, Ecodefense (Russia): +45 51 40 05 27 ; ecodefense@gmail.com

- Claire Greensfelder, International Forum on Globalization: +1 510 917 5468 or + 45 53 99 59 77 (Danish mobile); cgreensfelder@ifg.org

- Andrea Cocco, Legambiente (Italy): +45 53 99 74 25 ; a.cocco@legambiente.eu

- Sabine Bock, WECF: +49 176 22 82 74 69; sabine.bock@wecf.eu

Older Posts »

Categories